Overall Sustainability Score
50
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • AK
Sitka County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Sitka County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
50th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Sitka County
Sitka County currently has a sustainability score of 50 (Elevated) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 50th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (66, stable) and Insurance Pressure (62, decreasing).
Compared with Alaska, Sitka County is 9.8 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 62 • Trend: Decreasing
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 17.8% of income with -4.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 51 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $2,080 with -0.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 66 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,341 with -0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.8% with -1.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 33 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median household income is $101,727 with 0.5% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Sitka County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.