Overall Sustainability Score
70
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • IL
Lake Ka-Ho
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Lake Ka-Ho. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
93rd
Very Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Lake Ka-Ho
Lake Ka-Ho currently has a sustainability score of 70 (Manageable) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 93rd (very strong).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (52, increasing) and Income Offset (44, stable).
Compared with Macoupin County, Lake Ka-Ho is 5.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 18 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 14.0% of income with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 52 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $2,073 with 4.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 24 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $801 with 1.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 14 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 13.6% with -1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 44 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median household income is $70,805 with 3.3% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Lake Ka-Ho
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.