Overall Sustainability Score
57
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
U.S. Cost Pressure by Location
Burden • Change • Offset
County • KY
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Boyle County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Overall Sustainability Score
57
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
70th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
Boyle County currently has a sustainability score of 57 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 70th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (71, increasing) and Tax Pressure (45, stable).
Compared with Kentucky, Boyle County is 1.5 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 34 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 14.6% of income with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 45 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,731 with 1.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 29 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $778 with 1.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 42 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.3% with 1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Pressure Score: 71 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $61,159 with -0.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.