U.S. Cost Pressure by Location

Burden • Change • Offset

CityMA

Cedar Crest

This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Cedar Crest. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.

Sustainability Score

Latest Snapshot

2024-12-31

Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.

Overall Sustainability Score

39

High Pressure

Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure

Trend

Decreasing

National Percentile

24th

Weak

Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)

Local Narrative

What Is Driving Pressure In Cedar Crest

Cedar Crest currently has a sustainability score of 39 (High Pressure) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 24th (weak).

Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (86, increasing) and Tax Pressure (76, stable).

Compared with Plymouth County, Cedar Crest is 3.4 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).

Pressure Components

Component Breakdown

Higher component score = higher pressure

Research Path

Continue From Cedar Crest

Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.