Overall Sustainability Score
58
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • MN
Badger
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Badger. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
71st
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Badger
Badger currently has a sustainability score of 58 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 71st (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (57, increasing) and Income Offset (53, stable).
Compared with Roseau County, Badger is 5.1 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.9% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 57 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,779 with 8.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 29 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $880 with -0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 17 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 14.2% with -1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median household income is $74,474 with 1.2% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Badger
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.