Overall Sustainability Score
53
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • MN
Cook County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Cook County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
58th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Cook County
Cook County currently has a sustainability score of 53 (Elevated) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 58th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Insurance Pressure (65, stable) and Tax Pressure (53, stable).
Compared with Minnesota, Cook County is 7.3 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 65 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 17.4% of income with -1.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $2,304 with -0.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 43 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $886 with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 27 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 14.6% with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 46 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median household income is $72,638 with 1.4% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Cook County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.