U.S. Cost Pressure by Location

Burden • Change • Offset

CountyMN

Washington County

This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Washington County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.

Sustainability Score

Latest Snapshot

2024-12-31

Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.

Overall Sustainability Score

32

High Pressure

Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure

Trend

Increasing

National Percentile

9th

Weak

Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)

Local Narrative

What Is Driving Pressure In Washington County

Washington County currently has a sustainability score of 32 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 9th (weak).

Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (86, increasing) and Tax Pressure (79, increasing).

Compared with Minnesota, Washington County is 13.6 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).

Pressure Components

Component Breakdown

Higher component score = higher pressure

Research Path

Continue From Washington County

Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.