Overall Sustainability Score
78
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • MO
Mineral Point
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Mineral Point. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
99th
Very Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Mineral Point
Mineral Point currently has a sustainability score of 78 (Manageable) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 99th (very strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (54, decreasing) and Tax Pressure (28, increasing).
Compared with Washington County, Mineral Point is 3.1 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 10 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 13.3% of income with -2.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 28 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $719 with 5.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 10 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $684 with 0.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 13 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 14.6% with -6.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 54 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Median household income is $56,043 with 8.0% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Mineral Point
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.