Overall Sustainability Score
50
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
U.S. Cost Pressure by Location
Burden • Change • Offset
County • MS
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Tate County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Overall Sustainability Score
50
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
49th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
Tate County currently has a sustainability score of 50 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 49th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Insurance Pressure (72, stable) and Utility Pressure (72, increasing).
Compared with Mississippi, Tate County is 12.5 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 72 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 17.0% of income with 0.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 37 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,354 with 2.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 72 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $963 with 7.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 40 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 16.6% with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Pressure Score: 26 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $69,704 with 8.9% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.