U.S. Cost Pressure by Location

Burden • Change • Offset

CountyMT

Lewis and Clark County

This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Lewis and Clark County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.

Sustainability Score

Latest Snapshot

2024-12-31

Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.

Overall Sustainability Score

40

High Pressure

Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure

Trend

Stable

National Percentile

25th

Weak

Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)

Local Narrative

What Is Driving Pressure In Lewis and Clark County

Lewis and Clark County currently has a sustainability score of 40 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 25th (weak).

Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (84, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (73, stable).

Compared with Montana, Lewis and Clark County is 8.9 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).

Pressure Components

Component Breakdown

Higher component score = higher pressure

Research Path

Continue From Lewis and Clark County

Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.