Overall Sustainability Score
71
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • MT
Sheridan County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Sheridan County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
95th
Very Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Sheridan County
Sheridan County currently has a sustainability score of 71 (Manageable) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 95th (very strong).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (54, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (34, stable).
Compared with Montana, Sheridan County is 22.2 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 34 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 14.6% of income with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 54 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,521 with 5.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 21 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $746 with -0.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 7 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 12.8% with -9.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 25 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $70,147 with 10.2% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Sheridan County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.