Overall Sustainability Score
67
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • NV
Beaverdam
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Beaverdam. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
88th
Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Beaverdam
Beaverdam currently has a sustainability score of 67 (Manageable) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 88th (strong).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (62, increasing) and Essential Inflation Pressure (52, increasing).
Compared with Lincoln County, Beaverdam is 4.2 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 9 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 12.6% of income with -1.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 16 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $1,126 with -0.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 62 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $919 with 21.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 52 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.3% with 17.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 37 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $72,307 with 4.0% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Beaverdam
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.