Overall Sustainability Score
46
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • NY
Mariaville Lake
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Mariaville Lake. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
42nd
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Mariaville Lake
Mariaville Lake currently has a sustainability score of 46 (High Pressure) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 42nd (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (70, stable) and Utility Pressure (61, increasing).
Compared with Schenectady County, Mariaville Lake is 5.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 56 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 17.1% of income with -1.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 70 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $5,568 with 1.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 61 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,194 with 3.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 47 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 18.0% with -0.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 32 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $79,623 with 3.4% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Mariaville Lake
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.