Overall Sustainability Score
70
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • OK
Amorita
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Amorita. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
93rd
Very Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Amorita
Amorita currently has a sustainability score of 70 (Manageable) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 93rd (very strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (77, increasing) and Essential Inflation Pressure (42, increasing).
Compared with Alfalfa County, Amorita is 0.3 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 1 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 10.7% of income with -8.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 4 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $592 with -8.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 37 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $705 with 14.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 42 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 13.1% with 20.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 77 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $64,615 with -4.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Amorita
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.