Overall Sustainability Score
42
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • PA
Fawn Lake Forest
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Fawn Lake Forest. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
30th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Fawn Lake Forest
Fawn Lake Forest currently has a sustainability score of 42 (High Pressure) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 30th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Insurance Pressure (78, stable) and Tax Pressure (60, stable).
Compared with Pike County, Fawn Lake Forest is 4.4 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 78 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 19.1% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 60 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $3,542 with 1.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 57 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $1,378 with -0.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 20.3% with -2.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 37 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $81,323 with 2.5% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Fawn Lake Forest
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.