Overall Sustainability Score
53
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • SD
Alpena
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Alpena. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
57th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Alpena
Alpena currently has a sustainability score of 53 (Elevated) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 57th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Insurance Pressure (65, increasing) and Income Offset (61, increasing).
Compared with Jerauld County, Alpena is 1.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 65 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.9% of income with 5.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,265 with 4.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 33 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $632 with 11.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 38 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 10.3% with 14.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 61 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $73,750 with -2.2% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Alpena
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.