Overall Sustainability Score
56
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • SD
Fort Pierre
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Fort Pierre. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
65th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Fort Pierre
Fort Pierre currently has a sustainability score of 56 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 65th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (75, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (62, increasing).
Compared with Stanley County, Fort Pierre is 4.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 62 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.7% of income with 4.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 75 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $2,679 with 10.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 60 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $952 with 6.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 7 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 13.0% with -6.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 12 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median household income is $87,712 with 13.9% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Fort Pierre
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.