Overall Sustainability Score
65
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • SD
Harding County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Harding County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
88th
Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Harding County
Harding County currently has a sustainability score of 65 (Manageable) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 88th (strong).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (73, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (33, increasing).
Compared with South Dakota, Harding County is 0.3 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 33 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 12.0% of income with 6.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 73 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $1,863 with 27.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 31 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $521 with 9.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 22 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 7.8% with 1.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 15 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median household income is $80,441 with 7.6% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Harding County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.