Overall Sustainability Score
36
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • TX
Annetta North
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Annetta North. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
19th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Annetta North
Annetta North currently has a sustainability score of 36 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 19th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (84, increasing) and Utility Pressure (76, increasing).
Compared with Parker County, Annetta North is 3.1 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 74 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 18.2% of income with 0.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 84 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $5,249 with 5.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 76 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,500 with 4.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 52 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 17.2% with 1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 28 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $104,443 with 2.3% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Annetta North
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.