U.S. Cost Pressure by Location

Burden • Change • Offset

CityUT

Alpine

This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Alpine. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.

Sustainability Score

Latest Snapshot

2024-12-31

Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.

Overall Sustainability Score

38

High Pressure

Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure

Trend

Increasing

National Percentile

23rd

Weak

Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)

Local Narrative

What Is Driving Pressure In Alpine

Alpine currently has a sustainability score of 38 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 23rd (weak).

Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (86, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (72, stable).

Compared with Utah County, Alpine is 4.1 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).

Pressure Components

Component Breakdown

Higher component score = higher pressure

Research Path

Continue From Alpine

Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.